Fans often ask: Is this canon? It gets murky. Season 1 directly contradicts the 2011 Puss in Boots movie (where he meets Kitty Softpaws, who is entirely absent here). However, it fits beautifully into the Shrek timeline before Shrek 2 .
Visually and tonally, Season 1 excels by leaning into a aesthetic. The introduction of the Sphinx and various magical artifacts provides a fresh sandbox for Puss to showcase his swordplay. However, the season’s true strength lies in its supporting cast—characters like the innocent Dulcinea and the grumpy Artephius—who act as foils to Puss’s vanity and force him to prioritize the community over his own legend. The Adventures of Puss in Boots - Season 1
Unlike the film series, which follows Puss’s quest for the golden eggs or his adventure with Kitty Softpaws, finds the hero at a crossroads. After a heist gone wrong involving a magical celestial map and a duplicitous thief, Puss finds himself in the hidden, forgotten city of San Lorenzo . Fans often ask: Is this canon
To make matters worse, he steals a magical artifact: a pair of "Artephius' Glasses" (the "Boots of Attraction"). But the real hook of Season 1 is the introduction of (voiced by Maria Bamford). Dulcinea is a sweet, optimistic, and relentlessly cheerful kitten who believes Puss is a noble hero. She is also, accidentally, the voice of the "Dual-Glück" — a magical living baby named El Moco (The Booger). Yes, you read that correctly. The fate of San Lorenzo is tied to a floating, magical, diaper-wearing infant. However, it fits beautifully into the Shrek timeline
Subscribe to our newsletter to get all the news from the Lonely Mountains!
